Martin & Rose (2007: 139-40):
Another kind of internal consequence is to justify an argument, using after all:
On the face of it, we might argue that the evaluation in Helena's story comes from Helena.
She's the narrator after all.
Blogger Comments:
[1] To be clear, here the authors have misconstrued the function of conjunctive relations as justifying an argument. In SFL Theory, a conjunctive relation is a relation of expansion between spans of text.
[2] To be clear, after all does not mark any conjunctive relation, let alone one of consequence; the meaning here is not that realised by She's the narrator consequently.
In SFL Theory, this instance of after all functions interpersonally, not logically (or textually), as a asseverative propositional comment Adjunct enacting the modal assessment 'obvious'; see Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 190-1). The meaning here is generally that also realised by She's the narrator obviously.
In SFL Theory, this instance of after all functions interpersonally, not logically (or textually), as a asseverative propositional comment Adjunct enacting the modal assessment 'obvious'; see Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 190-1). The meaning here is generally that also realised by She's the narrator obviously.
No comments:
Post a Comment