Martin & Rose (2007: 52):
In sum we have seen four ways in which projection is used to attribute sources: as projecting clauses, as names for speech acts, as projecting within clauses, and as scare quotes. Examples of these are given in Table 2.6.
Blogger Comments:
In sum:
- Martin & Rose do not account for the logico-semantic relation of projection at the discourse semantic level.
- Martin & Rose mistake the names of projections — locutions or ideas — for the names of "speech acts".
- To be clear, "projecting within clauses" encompasses projection relations between verbal groups in verbal group complexes and the assignment of identifying and attributive relations by projection.
- Martin & Rose misinterpret the attitudinal function of scare quotes as disowning an appraisal, rather than enacting one.
No comments:
Post a Comment